Langley Times

Not enough heritage in building design

An architectural drawing of the design for a proposed two-storey building in historic Fort Langley that was rejected by a majority of Township council Monday for failing to fit in with the heritage character of the area. - submitted image
An architectural drawing of the design for a proposed two-storey building in historic Fort Langley that was rejected by a majority of Township council Monday for failing to fit in with the heritage character of the area.
— image credit: submitted image

A proposed new two-storey,  heritage-style office complex for the western entrance to Fort Langley was rejected Monday after a majority of Township councillors complained the exterior didn’t look heritage enough.

Councillor Charlie Fox had the most to say about the look of the proposed development in the 23100 block of 96 Avenue, little of it complimentary.

“This building does not fit,” Fox said.

“It has no heritage appeal at all.”

The building simply doesn’t look like a heritage structure, Fox said, arguing the exterior lacked heritage details, the windows were too large and the building design had pillars that don’t belong on an older style of architecture.

Councillor Kim Richter agreed, calling the submitted proposal “probably one of the most disappointing building designs that council has been asked to review.”

“This is nothing more than a big coloured box,” Richter said.

Richter added the people who designed the building are not at fault because they followed the Township heritage guidelines.

“I do think there is something drastically wrong with our heritage guidelines,” Richter said.

Councillor Grant Ward disagreed, calling the project “a good addition” to Fort Langley that was approved by the Township heritage advisory committee.

Councillor Bob Long said he “didn’t mind” the design and grumbled that the design approval process appeared to consist of “send it back until they come up with something Charlie likes.”

It was Councillor Steve Ferguson, with the support of Fox, who proposed referring the design back to staff “to review comments of council as to rectangular design, windows, doors, and covered areas, pedestrian interface with street, and Fort Langley gateway character.”

Mayor Jack Froese and Councillors David Davis, Long, and Ward opposed sending it back to staff.

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Lack of addiction treatment flagged by crime panel
 
Guilty plea in Langley arson attack
 
Second Langley farm hit by avian flu
Province okays transit tax referendum question, with some tweaks
 
Surrey RCMP officer to stand trial on multiple gun charges
 
Roads study provides ammunition for District of Kent
Federal court denies Burnaby appeal
 
Rent controls here to stay, province says
 
Boy, 3, hit and abandoned at Surrey bus stop

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.