News

Metro Vancouver rejects mobile home park rezoning

Bill MacDonald and Barb Berthelet were among a group of Forest Green Estates mobile home park residents who picketed Township hall in July, to protest a proposed change to the land use designation for the North Langley property, which they fear will make it easier to redevelop.  - Dan Ferguson/Langley Times
Bill MacDonald and Barb Berthelet were among a group of Forest Green Estates mobile home park residents who picketed Township hall in July, to protest a proposed change to the land use designation for the North Langley property, which they fear will make it easier to redevelop.
— image credit: Dan Ferguson/Langley Times

A controversial re-designation of a Langley Township mobile home park has been rejected by the Metro Vancouver regional authority, which voted down the proposed change to the Forest Green Estates mobile home park on Friday, Oct. 12.

The Township wanted to change the designation of the 23-hectare site which includes the 160-home, 55-and-over gated park at 9080 198 St. from industrial “mixed use” to “general urban.”

The proposal alarmed some Forest Green residents, who staged a protest at Langley Township hall in July to warn the change could lead to their wholesale eviction because it would make it easier to redevelop the property for condominiums.

At a town-hall-style meeting with council and senior Township staff held after the protest, residents were told the change to an urban designation would improve their protection because it would mean any rezoning application would have to have input from the residents, something that would not be required for an industrial property.

However, when the Township proposal went to Metro for approval, staff at the regional authority opposed the application, warning it would allow the urbanization of the industrial part of the land and put more pressure on scarce industrial land elsewhere in the region.

Township Mayor Jack Froese told the Friday meeting that redevelopment of the site, which also includes an industrial warehouse, could allow the property to accommodate more housing units and more jobs.

“We’re talking [about the loss of] one warehouse, not thousands of acres of farmland,” Froese said.

Richmond Councillor Harold Steves said Metro must be just as firm in preserving industrial land as it is in saving farmland.

“I am very concerned every time we take industrial land and convert it to urban or to mixed use because that means there’s a run on farmland somewhere else,” Steves said.

Surrey Councillor Linda Hepner said the proposal would add to the slow erosion of industrial land and noted its strategic location near the Port Kells industrial area, the South Fraser Perimeter Road, Highway 1 and railway yards.

 

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Surgical waits average five months in B.C.
 
Robbed Good Samaritan gets her gear replaced by Langley store
 
Bob Kuhn installed as TWU president
Fraser Health gets new president
 
Amrik Virk advised Kwantlen on secret executive bonus
 
Seven seniors flu clinics reinstated
Christmas in Williams Park cancelled
 
Two charged in Surrey stolen-vehicle incident that drew police fire
 
Christmas Kettle campaign kicks off

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 25 edition online now. Browse the archives.