Opinion

For the Record

In a Times editorial published July 31, it was stated that a conditional sentence is commonly handed down by the courts for a conviction of viewing and/or distributing child pornography. In fact, the Criminal Code of Canada prohibits conditional sentences for convictions involving offences for which there is a minimum sentence. Since 2005, the Criminal Code has set minimum prison sentences for accessing and distributing child pornography. The Times apologizes for the error. Furthermore, the editorial did not intend to suggest that government directly influences the judiciary.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

WOLF land deal is now dead
 
Ride-sharing company spooks taxi firms
 
Total crime up 21 per cent so far this year
Child ejected as Surrey collision shears car in half
 
Transit investment key to Metro Vancouver future, conference hears (with VIDEO)
 
First-degree murder charge in 2013 South Surrey homicide
Council seeks ways to fund sprinkler installation
 
Kinder Morgan takes pipeline protesters to court
 
Chilliwack keeps its competitive edge

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.