Opinion

For the Record

In a Times editorial published July 31, it was stated that a conditional sentence is commonly handed down by the courts for a conviction of viewing and/or distributing child pornography. In fact, the Criminal Code of Canada prohibits conditional sentences for convictions involving offences for which there is a minimum sentence. Since 2005, the Criminal Code has set minimum prison sentences for accessing and distributing child pornography. The Times apologizes for the error. Furthermore, the editorial did not intend to suggest that government directly influences the judiciary.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Surrey Memorial to act as Ebola centre for Lower Mainland
 
Gypsy moth infestation discovered in Cloverdale
 
Former South Surrey agent’s arrest makes international headlines
ER waits at Langley Memorial Hospital beat the average
 
Election 2014: Surrey school trustee candidates unite
 
Surrey enforcer killed on the weekend
Election 2014: Candidates hit social media and web
 
Royal City Farmers Market lovers have their reasons
 
Surrey MLA hits the streets for welfare challenge

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 21 edition online now. Browse the archives.