Opinion

There's no good reason for Langley residents to support car tax

Talks on Friday between Transportation Minister Todd Stone and Lower Mainland mayors about transit seemed to offer some hope of a way out of the transportation funding dilemma.

Mayors have been highly critical of Stone and the provincial government, stating that a proposed referendum is confusing and that no priorities were apparent. After a war of words escalated, Stone offered to give mayors more control over TransLink’s budget — a major point. He also backed off on insisting that a referendum on new funding options be held in conjunction with this fall’s municipal elections.

Some mayors are sounding a little more conciliatory, but one suggestion made by the chair of the Mayors’ Council on TransLink, Richard Walton, needs to be watched like a hawk.

Walton suggested Friday that perhaps a referendum could be held this fall, simply calling for a car tax on all Lower Mainland vehicle owners. The funds would go solely to expanding bus service.

TransLink already has power, under the legislation incorporating it, to implement a universal car tax. It was set to go down that path in its first few years of existence, in the late 1990s, when drivers revolted.

Many of those who fought the hardest came from Langley and Surrey, and other areas which were poorly-served by the bus system. They complained, quite rightly in my view, that they would be paying additional taxes to provide more buses to people in other areas, and they would get no benefit from the car tax.

Fast forward 15 years. Surrey and Langley have grown dramatically. The bus service is marginally better than it was — there is the new 555 bus to the Braid Station from Carvolth Park and Ride, and connecting routes to SkyTrain like the 502 and 501 are heavily-used.

But Surrey residents still have no bus over the Port Mann Bridge to SkyTrain, despite a promise to that effect when the new bridge was announced. Areas such as Willoughby have little or no transit service. And there are no plans to increase transit service in this area.

Nor is there any movement to expand rapid transit beyond Whalley. So if there was a car tax,  the benefits would mostly flow to Vancouver, Burnaby, Richmond and New Westminster residents, who are already very well-served with both rapid transit and bus service.

There is no good reason for anyone in Langley to vote “yes” to a car tax. The few who rely exclusively on buses won’t get much more in the way of service. The vast majority of people here own and operate cars (at a cost of about $10,000 per vehicle per year) in order to travel to work, shopping and school. They are not getting a break on tolls. In fact they must pay tolls to cross the river, unless they travel long distances to avoid them.

While a car tax might offer a quick fix for some mayors and for TransLink, it would be of no benefit to people here.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
 
COLUMN: Some advice to Kinder Morgan from the mushy middle
 
Hunter protest over new regulations to benefit guides fills Langley meeting room
Surrey murder victim identifed as Jaylen Sandhu, 17
 
Door-to-door mail service being eliminated in Mission
 
Carly Rae Jepsen surprises Christmas at the Clarke fans
B.C.-only wines to come to some grocery stores
 
COLUMN: Ideas for a non-toy Christmas
 
COLUMN: Growth does not come cheaply

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.