Opinion

Seeing both sides of: four-year council terms

The case for

Three-year terms are funny beasts. You spend the first year learning the ropes and the players, the second trying to implement changes and the third putting things on hold because there is an election taking place.

Four-year terms would allow for much greater consistency, much more actual governing to take place.

And isn’t good governance what we elect them for?

 

The case against

Four years may make sense to those glass-half-full folks.

The rest of us have a bigger concern: what happens if we elect a bunch of duds?

How do we protect ourselves from the amount of damage they can wreak during a longer term in office.

No four-year term should be acceptable without a mechanism in place that allows for recall.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

B.C. Muslim Association speaks out on gunman
 
UPDATE: 2 confirmed dead in Marysville, Washington school shooting
 
Police seek help in search for missing Langley man
A short getaway
 
Election 2014: Gayle Martin seeking re-election to Langley City council
 
Election 2014: Election debate turns to sprawl
This camera was worth a thousand thank-yous
 
A place for Hadiya girls to belong
 
Smash-and-grab thieves target dance studio

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.