Seeing both sides of: four-year council terms

The case for

Three-year terms are funny beasts. You spend the first year learning the ropes and the players, the second trying to implement changes and the third putting things on hold because there is an election taking place.

Four-year terms would allow for much greater consistency, much more actual governing to take place.

And isn’t good governance what we elect them for?


The case against

Four years may make sense to those glass-half-full folks.

The rest of us have a bigger concern: what happens if we elect a bunch of duds?

How do we protect ourselves from the amount of damage they can wreak during a longer term in office.

No four-year term should be acceptable without a mechanism in place that allows for recall.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Container recycling lags in Metro Vancouver
Empty coal trains to continue travelling on lightly-used SRY line in North Langley until Nov. 30
B.C. lawyers vote to overturn Christian law school recognition
Suspected Langley thief takes unintentional selfie
In the ditch
Cigarette smuggler fined $3,380
Harriet and Friday found in Agassiz
Return to Sender campaign underway for unwanted election material
Border toll could raise millions for TransLink

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.