Inspectors examine the top floor of Paddington Station following the Dec. 11 fire that left dozens homeless. Robert Freeman, whose son, daughter-in-law and granddaughter lived in the building, wonders why no fire protection barriers were installed in the attic when the structure was built, less than 10 years ago.

Letter: Many ‘what ifs’ in aftermath of Paddington Station fire

Editor: Our son, daughter-in-law and granddaughter were planning to stay overnight at our home Christmas Eve to get an early start opening Santa’s gifts.

As a result of the Paddington fire on Dec. 11, they came much earlier than planned, and are with us for the unforeseen future.

Our home, in which they are now residing, is a side-by-side duplex in Surrey.

The walls on all levels adjoining our neighbour have a two-hour fire wall protection.

In addition, this fire wall continues up into the attic between the rafters, tight to the underside of the roof, to prevent — or at least slow down — a fire passing from one side of the duplex attic to the next.

Our home was built in 1996/97. Paddington was built in 2008 — more than 10 years later.

The Paddington fire travelled, unimpeded, from one attic space above the original source of the fire throughout the attic space of the entire building, as most of the 84 tenants watched in desperation and dismay, and the firefighters tried to prevent the fire from spreading to other buildings.

What if, like our home, fire walls continued into the Paddington attic providing a fire break between each of the approximately 20 units on the top floor?

What if the building designers, builders, City of Langley and fire suppression engineer acknowledged the proven fire risk of the approved attic structure and did something to reduce the known potential future impact?

What if the builder added approximately $1,000 to the cost of each unit in Paddington to install the fire wall separations above each of the top floor units? Would this .005 per cent cost increase/unit turn away buyers?

What if those involved in the design, approval, building construction and inspection of Paddington treated their role as if it was going to result in their potential home being built?

Might they have acted on the known fire risk to prevent the preventable, or at least reduce the magnitude of the event?

What if all parties involved in the Paddington building construction stopped deflecting, showed some organization ethic and took a stand to ensure an unsafe building like Paddington is never built/approved by them in the future?

If what was designed for the Paddington fire-destroyed building is the same structure as its sister building on the adjacent Paddington land, what can be done to remediate a known fire risk and potential future personal and financial disaster for its owners/tenants, and the Langley community?

If what was built in our Surrey home in 1997 to protect two families from a catastrophic fire was known to be necessary and economically viable, why was this same basic proven fire suppression strategy not employed 10 years later for 84 families in Paddington?

The Paddington fire was caused by smoking materials discarded by a careless tenant/owner.

The magnitude of the consequences of this act were the result of choices made by informed professionals who knew better, but acted based on other priorities.

Robert Freeman,

Surrey

Just Posted

COLUMN: Technology gives me hope my father will walk again

Lokomat taught Michael Coss to walk again after brain injury – and you could help bring it to Surrey

Decision to opt out of Operation Red Nose made last spring, says Langley Gymnastics

ORN drivers in neighbouring communities will fill Langley/Surrey gaps as best they can

Curling competition cutting close ahead of BC Junior Curling Championships

Qualifiers for December’s championships come down to the decimal point

Theatre stuff from stolen trailer found strewn on Surrey roadside

‘It’s going to take a little while to go through it all and find out what’s ruined and what’s OK’

Golden time for Langley pair on the water

Langley women team up to win gold at rowing national championships in Burnaby

VIDEO: Two years in review with Cloverdale-Langley City MP

John Aldag sits down to talk about heritage, economics

‘I will now live in consistent fear’: Allan Schoenborn granted escorted leaves

The Merritt man was deemed not criminally responsible in the killing of his three children in 2008

Hammy the deer dodges conservation officers in Prince Rupert

The famous Prince Rupert hammock deer maintains his purple threads

‘No shirt, no service, no Canada’

Shirtless Tacoma man arrested after Canadian border officials say they found meth in rental vehicle

Nasty note on B.C. windshield sparks online outrage

Vernon’s Bailey McDonald is using a painful experience to start conversation about invisible illness

Delta-Richmond Operation Red Nose kicks off with call for volunteers

ORN uses volunteers to provide motorists who have been drinking a free ride home — in their own cars

Federal funding to combat guns, gangs and opioid crisis

Public Safety Minister Ralph Goodale said illicit drugs are often main cause of guns, gangs violence

Riverview youth mental health centre proceeds

Replacement for Maples Treatment Centre first announced in March

Overnight lane closures at Highway 91 and 72nd Avenue

Left turn lanes off of the highway onto 72nd eastbound will be closed to install drainage culverts

Most Read