Letters to the Editor

Much left to destroy in Willoughby

Editor: Re: the “We Say” editorial (The Times, Feb. 14).

It contained the sentence “Much of Willoughby has yet to be developed and there are plenty of possible sites available.”

This is incorrect. The correct sentence should be “Much of Willoughby has yet to be destroyed and there are plenty of possible sites available.”

Brian Johnson,

Willoughby.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

B.C. Federation of Labour votes to back transit referendum
 
Taekwando student helps two in distress, while her computers and university course work stolen
 
Forest fence put on hold
Amrik Virk advised Kwantlen on secret executive bonus
 
Christmas Kettle campaign kicks off
 
Getting to the needle point
Maple Ridge tree bylaw still a work in progress
 
ELECTION 2014: Malcolm Brodie won all polls, councillors split
 
Ethel Tibbits Awards raise a record amount

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Nov 25 edition online now. Browse the archives.