Letters to the Editor

Much left to destroy in Willoughby

Editor: Re: the “We Say” editorial (The Times, Feb. 14).

It contained the sentence “Much of Willoughby has yet to be developed and there are plenty of possible sites available.”

This is incorrect. The correct sentence should be “Much of Willoughby has yet to be destroyed and there are plenty of possible sites available.”

Brian Johnson,

Willoughby.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Clark on climate, clawbacks, credit cards
 
COLUMN: Some advice to Kinder Morgan from the mushy middle
 
Sprinker system credited with containing kitchen fire
Captain Curtis: Hodgson selected to wear Stealth ‘C’
 
Virk shuffled to new job after Kwantlen flap
 
Chilliwack council sends ALC application back for another look
You’re never too old to go back
 
COLUMN: Ideas for a non-toy Christmas
 
COLUMN: Growth does not come cheaply

Community Events, December 2014

Add an Event


Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Dec 18 edition online now. Browse the archives.