Letters to the Editor

Much left to destroy in Willoughby

Editor: Re: the “We Say” editorial (The Times, Feb. 14).

It contained the sentence “Much of Willoughby has yet to be developed and there are plenty of possible sites available.”

This is incorrect. The correct sentence should be “Much of Willoughby has yet to be destroyed and there are plenty of possible sites available.”

Brian Johnson,

Willoughby.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Optimism after meeting in Victoria to discuss Willoughby school challenges
 
Pirate ship bonds community together
 
Labour consumes most new tax dollars cities collect
Child ejected as Surrey collision shears car in half
 
B.C. lawyers vote to overturn Christian law school recognition
 
Teacher strike cheques in the mail
Decade trend shows crime dropping slowly in Surrey
 
First-degree murder charge in 2013 South Surrey homicide
 
Election 2014: Chilliwack crime rate is trending downward

Community Events, November 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.