Letters to the Editor

Trees were cut down because they died

Editor: Your interview with Jim Davis on your front page (The Times, May 1) criticizing the cutting down of two big trees on 240 Street and 63 Avenue really upset me. I live just east of the trees in question, and have an unobstructed view.

It pained us to see these two tall trees dead. It was not a pretty sight. We also had to cut down a couple of 80-foot trees, which were rotten on the inside but looked perfectly fine.

But when I talked to the owner, who was also very sad about it, she explained that the trees died because the Township ordered them to put in a drainage ditch, by which means the roots got damaged. These owners are very upset and out a lot of money. So be careful what you criticize, if you don’t know the reason behind it.

Maaike Wansink,


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Dynamic Duo opens Café Classico season at LCMS
A stunning trash-formation
Election 2014: Lorraine Baldwin seeks Board of Education seat
And you thought culture was extinct
Wait For Me Daddy memorial to be unveiled in New Westminster
District seeks input on proposed highway move
Haunted Forest Scream Train rolls out the thrills and chills
Culture Days kicks off in Surrey today
Teams wanted to tackle 50-hour filmmaking challenge

Community Events, September 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Sep 30 edition online now. Browse the archives.