Letters to the Editor

Trees were cut down because they died

Editor: Your interview with Jim Davis on your front page (The Times, May 1) criticizing the cutting down of two big trees on 240 Street and 63 Avenue really upset me. I live just east of the trees in question, and have an unobstructed view.

It pained us to see these two tall trees dead. It was not a pretty sight. We also had to cut down a couple of 80-foot trees, which were rotten on the inside but looked perfectly fine.

But when I talked to the owner, who was also very sad about it, she explained that the trees died because the Township ordered them to put in a drainage ditch, by which means the roots got damaged. These owners are very upset and out a lot of money. So be careful what you criticize, if you don’t know the reason behind it.

Maaike Wansink,


We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

You might like ...

Charleston development goes from highrise to five-storey condo complex
Election 2014: Alison McVeigh seeks another term on Langley Board of Education
PHOTO: Some Seriously Giant Gourds
Crystal Gala prohibition theme draws 400
Abbotsford bank robber sentenced
Ghost Ridge a nightmare
COLUMN: Dealing with secondary suites
COLUMN: Justice obstructed
University Is Free In Germany. Should Canada Copy and Paste?

Community Events, October 2014

Add an Event

Read the latest eEdition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Oct 23 edition online now. Browse the archives.