Letter: Don’t impose cost of water service on those who don’t want it

Editor: Last fall, ballots were sent out to over 160 property owners on 232 Street, 48 Avenue and Fraser Highway, to see if they  were in favour of receiving GVRD water from the new East Langley water supply line.

Each property received a cost estimate for the “benefit” of having it placed on their street, and some of the extra costs if they wanted to connect to it.

The petition was rejected by the voters, but no notification of the results were sent out to the property owner concerned, “because it costs money to send out such information”.

The real reason for this lack of information seems to be that staff is working on an agenda to ask council for another petition vote, this time excluding some of the areas that mostly voted no.

Whatever happened to open and transparent governance, with public consultation?

I realize that there are those who would like to receive this water, but that is no reason to impose these exorbitant costs on the majority of us who don’t need or want it.

With global warming, dropping water levels in the reservoirs and ever-increasing water restrictions, water has to be treated as a precious resource and saved for areas that need it most. This is not one of those areas.

If council approves the plan to ignore the first vote and proceed with a second one, then maybe all of the voters who voted no should be taken off the voting list, leaving those who want it to vote on a project with the costs recalculated and divided amongst them.

Anyone wanting to connect at a later date would then be subject to late-comer fees.

Those who think that receiving GVRD water will be a benefit should consider the wonderful taste of chlorinated water, with increasingly restricted use during the summer months.

Given council’s proven inability to keep tax and utility fee increases even close to the rate of inflation, a rapidly increasing annual cost for this product can be expected.

Maybe, in a show of concern for the taxpayers’ dollar, council will consider the unnecessary cost of another vote and just respect the wishes of the majority who voted no the first time.

Maybe.

Ken and Sharon Lind,

Langley

Just Posted

VIDEO: Fans turn out for anniversary of iconic antique store in Langley

Weekend event was also a fund-raiser for Salvation Army Gateway of Hope

Giants hand Victoria their first lost of the season

Langley’s WHL team went head to head with the Royals for the second day in a row, beating them 3-2.

Langley Rugby women take out Bayside Sharks

Three-game home series at Langley playing field

TWU player turns in record-setting performance in Saturday win over Mount Royal

Seina Kashima ‘always a threat’ Langley university coach says

PHOTOS: Langley and Abbotsford Olympians Swim Club holds competition

Event at Walnut Grove pool first intra-club swim meet of the season

Secret supper clubs test appetite for cannabis-infused food ahead of legalization

Chefs are eagerly awaiting pot edibles to become legal in Canada

BREAKING: Prince Harry and Meghan expecting their 1st child in spring

The announcement of the pregnancy confirms weeks of speculation from royal watchers

Students unhappy with SFU’s response after violent incident in class

Professor, students say a man threw chairs and hit a female student

Enbridge to begin building road to access pipeline explosion site in B.C.

An explosion Tuesday knocked out a 91-centimetre line

Man struck by car in Burnaby: reports

Pedestrian was taken to hospital

Andrew Scheer on revamped NAFTA deal: ‘I would have signed a better one’

Conservative leader says he wouldn’t have signed USMCA

Matheson will have NHL hearing after Canucks rookie Pettersson hit

The 19-year-old Swedish centre appeared woozy after the hit

Police looking into VPD-involved collision that sent 3 to hospital

The independent police watchdog has been notified

Police investigate after woman stabbed in Vancouver

Report came in about a ‘disturbance’ in the Killarney neighbourhood

Most Read