The fuss is all about three storeys

Opponents of Coulter Berry give lip service to positives, but then slam building project

Editor: I would appreciate if you printed the following response to Alister Frayne’s letter to the editor (The Times, March 18).

If anything within the Coulter Berry debate has been reductio ad absurdum, it is Frayne’s letter suggesting no good reasons were offered for the proposed rezoning for Coulter Berry at its recent public hearing. It’s weird though, considering he stated exactly what people were saying “the building was unique, LEED-certified, attractive, and so on.”

I guess the only speech he listened to at the public hearing was his own. In fact, many supporters, (who, by the way, significantly outnumbered opponents), offered lots of justification for Coulter Berry 2.0: underground parking, a more walkable design, and a great interface to Lee’s Market, all of which is only possible because of the third floor. Lots of us want to see more walkable designs, not parking lots in Fort Langley’s commercial core.

Perhaps Frayne is upset that he represents what many Coulter Berry opponents outlined they would be happy with: the lowest common denominator of movie set architecture, as long as it is two storeys.

And maybe he’s upset because when he and all the other opponents put their fingers in their ears saying “la la la, we can’t hear you,” they missed the part about how the OCP actually supports three storeys and hiding parking, and now they look silly. Tsk, tsk, we should always listen to the facts.

How is this version of a Monty Python parody?

“I like Mr. Woodward’s building but it’s illegal and I’d like him to make it two storeys”

“Yes, but why make it two storeys if the OCP actually supports a third floor for residential?”

“So that it can be two storeys and we can park on the street.”

“Yes, but why park on the street if there can be an underground?”

“So that we can have it two storeys.”

“Yes, but why….”

(repeat, ad nauseum)

We all know what Frayne’s answer to that question would be. He wants his third floor for free. To that, council should indeed say “reductio ad absurdum.”

 

Susan T. Morris,

Langley

Just Posted

‘It’s like a party in your mouth’

Langley creator’s Milkshake Burger makes its debut at the PNE

Grass fire closes Mufford overpass to traffic

Township fire crews using ladder truck to battle blaze

Chilliwack gymnast to compete in Pan American Championships

Canadian national teamer Zachary Clay travels to Peru in September for international competition.

Trinity Western University changes controversial covenant

Pledge forbidding sexual intimacy outside of marriage optional, but only for students

Pitt Meadows airport manager resigns

Guy Miller was just two months on the job

Average Canadian family spends 43% of income on taxes: study

Fraser Institute’s consumer report shows taxes accounting for larger chunk of income each year

RCMP to search for body after man drowns in B.C.’s Buntzen Lake

Officers and fire crews responded but the man from the Lower Mainland is believed to have drowned.

Police chiefs call for stricter controls on pill presses to fight opioids

Canada’s police chiefs are urging Ottawa to beef up its fight against the opioid scourge by closely vetting people who import pill presses

Hot, dry conditions forces drought rating to highest level on Vancouver Island

The province says Vancouver Island is under Stage 4 drought conditions

Victoria police say explicit calls continue to target women

Over 50 reports of unwanted, sexually explicit calls have come in

Get involved in the Great Canadian Bumble Bee Count

Environmental organization develops app to help with the nationwide count

Pesticides linked to bee deaths will be phased out in Canada, sources say

Neonicotinoids, or neonics, are a class of pesticides used by farmers and hobby gardeners alike

Wildfire smoke blankets B.C. and Alberta, prompting air quality advisories

About 25 new wildfires were sparked between Monday morning and midday Tuesday

Most Read